Politics

Otto von Bismarck once said: “ Never believe anything in politics, until it has been officially denied.”

 

“CRYPTO-COMMUNISM” 

The exact contrary of what is generally believed is often the truth. Jean de la Bruyere (1645-1695) 

According to François Kieffer: Nobody ever talks about anything more than when it no longer exists, then we must believe that love, truth, happiness, peace are nonexistent, or that they are experiencing a terrible crisis, because never has there been so much discussion about them.  The opposite also is true.  When the mainstream media keeps saying that Communism is finished, I say, Communism has never been more alive than it is today. 

However, we should first clarify what we mean by Communism.

We have different types of Communism: Soviet Communism, Chinese Communism, Communism of Fidel Castro’s Cuba, Albanian-type Communism and so on.  What really differentiates them – different history and cultural background, etc.  is less striking than what they have in common. 

Communism: 1840 Landais.|| Communist 1769, Mirabeau,

(coproprietaire, co-owners or corporation)…Commune  XII

century Ogier (comagne) “Freed town” and a group of town bourgeois…From the Nouveau Dictionnaire Etymologique LAROUSSE.  Communism, revolutionary political movement advocating this theory and seeking to establish an international classless society (my emphasis) in which productive resources are owned in common and used for the benefit of all. System of government based on this theory, as in the Soviet Union.  Social system characterized by the communal sharing of goods and services. (French communisme from commune general, universal, from Latin communis.) Collier’s Dictionary. 

Most people think that Communism originated with Karl Marx.

No, Communism started with the French Revolution. “From the moment the Revolutionaries were masters of Paris the Hotel de Ville was seized, the Government driven out of Versailles and the COMMUNE established in its place.’ (World Revolution, Nesta Webster, p.206) 

What all Communisms have in common are totalitarian governments, (absolute State control in everything and at all levels), Internationalism, and ultimately, One World Government. All the political & economical power is in the hands of a few self-appointed. 

Even though Russia is no longer called USSR, its present economy, ironically, is of a capitalistic type, i.e. Western.   

China, the second most powerful Marxist country, is not much different politically from Russia.  Both countries have followed the same path.  They share the same Marxist, humanistic philosophy as well as the same capitalistic economics which, in the past, they both loathed so much.  If we go to China or Russia today, we will see how well established are the Coca Colas, McDonalds, Toyotas, Fiats, General Motors, Microsoft, and so on. 

Now we might well ask, what has all this got to do withCommunism?  Weren't we talking about what these communist countries have in common: totalitarian states (one political system and one party State) as well as having adopted the capitalism of their Western counterparts?  

The very roots of capitalism (or neo-capitalism, as we might call it) we have in our society are the same, which gave birth to Marxism (Communism) in the past.   (Nesta Webster, “World Revolution”) 

Historically, capital, ie. the means of production, has always been in the hands of a few people.  Today, these same people hold and pull the strings of the international monetary purse, that is, the Wall Street Market, the World Bank & the I.M.F.  Through the international financial and banking system the internationalist globalists (read Communists) are creating, on the economic level, a totalitarian global economic system (read New World Order) under the guise of "Free Trade" (WTO & WEF.)  This is no different from what we had (and still have today) in USSR and in China. 

Isn't that what we call Communism? I call it "Crypto-Communism", because it is hidden, in disguise, or under other names. However before we come to that I wish to describe a different approach in which our “friends” (Communists or Socialists) are most skillfully endowed.  This approach is called “incubation by the cuckoo” or manipulating others to do the work for them. 

The cuckoo is a brood parasite; the female lays her eggs in the nest of a smaller bird, which raise the young cuckoos, usually at the expense of their own young. I have chosen the cuckoo as an example to explain how this socialist-Marxist based philosophy has infiltrated here in Australia. 

This technique is also called the “indirect approach” - in countries like China, Korea, Cuba, Vietnam, Angola, and Rhodesia, the philosophy of the former Union of Soviet Socialist Republics is infiltrated through ‘education’ and ‘development’. 

At the political level in Australia we have in our midst the Labor, Democrats, Social Democrats, Socialists, Liberals, Greens, Communists,' etc. etc., all of which parties are the cuckoo’1s eggs. All of them could be regrouped into one bunch called the "New Left."   Under their masks, they all share the same Marxist philosophy (New World Order.) 

In Australia, before our very eyes, the federal government, whether Labor or Coalition, has never stopped selling Australian assets to foreign investors - over 80% so far.  The Australian farming industry is dying - from 300,000 farms2, less than 100,00 are now in operation.  Small business is dying.  Our monetary system is dependent to the American dollar, ie. Wall Street.  We have plenty of oil (70% of our own needs) in our own soil, but we buy it from the multinational oil companies, at the cost of world trade, ie, at the fixed price.  That is International Monopoly.  So much for free trade & competition! 

Our Australian government is not serving us at all, but care taking for the Internationalists/Globalists (read Communists) of the day, that is for Wall Street and their Masters.  We will end up in the situation of the Russian or Chinese people, if something is not done before it is too late. 

The warning of Edmund Burke has gone unheeded, "All that is needed for evil to triumph is for good people to do nothing".  He could have been speaking directly to the Australians of this new millennium.  

 

Shalom