Archives: Elymas Part 2

“How did we arrive at such a sorry state of affairs in the Catholic Church?” and

It is obvious that the “reform” [another buzzword] of Vatican II created more problems than it solved, so before we can answer these two questions, I have to stress the importance of those 1962-65 sessions in bringing the “goods” of Vatican II to the world.

Since Vatican II, the Catholic Church has gone through a few changes, not for the better, as I have described above, to the point she is now beyond recognition for those who know what Catholic means. The generation born in the 50’s, and so educated in the ‘60s and since, would not know what the Church is, let alone her history, doctrine and tradition – without some exceptional special grace conferred on them directly by the Holy Spirit.

The universality of the Catholic Church has always been her inherent characteristic which, for two thousand years, had distinguished her from other religions. From Jerusalem to Antioch, from Corinth to Alexandria, from Thessalonica to Rome, even during very ‘stormy weather’, the Catholic Church has ultimately acted in a unique and unitarian way whether on a theological, moral or disciplinary level.

While the Apostles were still alive, with Peter as the first of the Twelve, they formed, since Pentecost [Acts 2], the inner circle of the expanding and dynamic Church. Thanks to the Apostles and the Holy Spirit, the Church grew and spread to the four corners of the earth. But after the last Apostle died, when disputes arose over theological, moral, and disciplinary matters, the still young Christian churches around the Roman Empire looked to Rome for the final word. “Rome had spoken,” they would say. By the fourth century, Rome had established itself as the centre of Christianity and the Bishop of Rome had taken Peter’s chair, i.e. the Petrine authority. Thus was the Papacy[5] established as Catholic Tradition that all the bishops around the world are united under their head, the Pope.

That was fine till Vatican II started changing things from within, to the point where we must ask the unthinkable questions[6],

Again there is no way we can answer those questions adequately, or understand what is going on in Catholic Church, if we don’t disclose the prime movers, the Elymas, the culprits for the mess we are in.

‘The Jewish Question and the Council’

What follows are excerpts from Vicomte Leon De Poncins’ “Judaism and the Vatican”:

“On the 19^th November 1964, the bishops and cardinals of the Catholic Church gathered in Council at Rome passed by an overwhelming majority the Schema dealing with the attitude of the Church towards Judaism” [page 9].

“The truth, it is suggested, is that a number of Jewish organizations and personalities are behind the reforms which were proposed at the Council with a view to modifying the Church’s attitude and time-honoured teaching about Judaism: Jules Isaac (my emphasis), Label Katz, President of the B’nai B’rith, Nahum Goldman, President of the World Jewish Congress, etc” [p. 10].

“Of the Jewish personalities mentioned above, there was one who played a vital role: the writer, Jules Isaac, of Aix-en-Provence who died recently. He was at one time Inspector-General of Public Education in France and author of academic books on history

‘Isaac turned the Council to advantage, having found there considerable support among progressive bishops. In fact he became the principal theorist and promoter of the campaign being waged against the traditional teaching of the Church.

‘This is the gist of his thesis: We must have done with anti-Semitism, the logical outcome of which the liquidation of European Jews at Auschwitz and other death camps during the Second World War.

According to him, the most dangerous form of anti-Semitism is Christian anti-Semitism, which is fundamentally theological. Indeed, the Christian attitude to Judaism has always been based on the account of the Passion as described by the four Evangelists and as commented on by the Fathers of the Church such as St. John Chrysostom, St. Ambrose, St. Augustine, Pope Gregory the Great, St. Agobard, Primate of the Gauls, and many others.” [p. 11]

“In 1949 he made contacts with the clergy in Rome, and through them he was able to obtain a private audience with Pius XII, to whom he pleaded on behalf of Judaism, asking him to have the “Ten Points of Seelisberg” examined.

In 1959 he held a conference at Sorbonne on the need for revising Christian teaching on the Jews and he closed with an appeal to Pope John’s sense of justice and love and truth.

Shortly afterwards he met several prelates of the Roman Curia, in particular Cardinal Tisserand, Jullie, Ottaviani, and Cardinal Bea (my emphasis); and on the 13^th June 1960 he was granted an audience by the Pope, whom he asked to condemn the “teaching of contempt”, suggesting that a sub-commission should be set up specifically to study the problem.

Some time afterwards Jules Isaac “learned with joy that his suggestions had been considered by the Pope and handed on to Cardinal Bea[7] for examination”. The latter set up a special working party to study relations between the Church and Israel (my emphasis), which finally resulted in the Council vote on the 20^th November 1964.” [pp. 12-13]

~Condemn and suppress all racial, religious or national discrimination with regard to the Jews;

~ Modify or suppress liturgical prayers concerning the Jews, especially those on Good Friday;

~ Declare that the Jews are in no way responsible for the death of Christ, for which the whole humanity is to blame;

~ Quash the passages, in the Evangelists, and principally the one in St. Matthew, whom Jules Isaac coldly describes as a liar and perverter of the truth, in which they relate the crucial story of the Passion;

~ Declare that the Church has always been to blame for this state of latent war which has persisted for two thousands years between the Jews, the Christians and the rest of the world;

~ Promise that the Church will definitely modify her attitude to a spirit of humility, contrition and forgiveness with regard to the Jews, and that she will make every effort to repair the wrongs that she has done them by rectifying and purifying her traditional teaching according to the lines laid down by Jules Isaac.

of the Evangelists and of the teaching of the Fathers of the Church, which is founded on the very words of Christ himself, Jules Isaac received strong support from priests even in Rome and from many members of Amitie’ judeo-chretienne.” [p. 29]

I don’t think it necessary to add more. It is self-revealing that the Catholic Church in Australia, and elsewhere, is under the spell of Judaic-Talmudic Masonic forces [B’nai B’rith, Anti Defamation League, Jewish Defense League, World Jewish Council and American Israeli Public Affairs Committee].

Jules Isaac, [with Cardinals Augustin Bea, Casaroli, Annibale Bugnini, Jean Villot - all Masons], was the modern Elymas. Today we have Archbishop Paul Marcinkus[8], Cardinals Walter Kasper[9], and Leo Suenens[10], among many others.

Yes, “the fish rots from the head”, and Australia is not different from elsewhere in the world. We Catholics are living in a state of spiritual starvation, and a quasi-total confusion at all levels. This is not a very good picture, I am afraid.

So what is the point of all this exercise? Well, I think somebody has to speak out and tell the truth even if it is painful to accept and means alienation for the teller. Naturally, Elymas hates the truth, which reminds me of what somebody once said:

“Truth is hate to those who hate the truth – if you can’t talk about it, it must be truth.”

Bishops' Committee for Doctrine and Morals

Bishops' Committee for the Family and for Life

http://www.acbc.catholic.org.au/bc/famlife/index.asp

[1] Elymas: from a Semitic root, “the man of hidden things”.

[2] The following URL will bring some light on the historical link between the Zionist/Communist State of Israel and the Church: http://www.libertyforum.org/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=news_international&Number=293173264#Post293173264]

[3] Indeed, Turner and his wife, Jane Fonda, have served as Goodwill Ambassadors for the U.N. Population Fund. AL GORE, THE UNITED NATIONS, AND THE CULT OF GAIA (treaties, UN mysticism, Gore's book) U.S. taxpayers are being forced to subsidize a new form of state religion which holds that natural resources have to be protected for the sake of Gaia, a so-called Earth spirit. This religious movement, which has cult-like qualities, is being promoted by leading figures and organizations such as Vice President Albert Gore, broadcaster Ted Turner, and the United Nations.

[http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a39eb5ea214d6.htm]

[4] Collegiality: We might think that the word ‘collegiality’ is new, because before Vatican II hardly was ever mentioned it. Catholic Encyclopaedia (pages 230-231) says: “A broad term that describes the exercise of the authority in the Church. The fundamental teaching and governing authority, ordered to the building up of the Body of Christy and ultimately the salvation of the members of the Church, has been handed down from the Apostles. The Apostles did not act in isolation as they continued the mission of Christ, but rather as one body, even though they might have been geographically separated. They formed one college with St. Peter as their head. In the most fundamental sense, collegiality means the working together to promote the mission of the Church. It does not mean that all have equal authority with regard to ecclesiastical offices held.

In the strict sense, collegiality describes the manner in which the body of bishops in communion with the Church, together with the Pope, exercises its power. It does so solemnly when the concept bishops gather in ecumenical council acting in union with the successor of Peter (cf. LG, nn.23; 25). The bishops also act in a collegial manner when they exercise their responsibilities while dispersed throughout the world. The concept of collegiality means that the bishops do not function as vicars or representatives of Pope. Rather, they act as representatives of Christ in their dioceses. Because the Lord named Peter to be the head of the Church, the bishops act collegially only when doing so together with the successor of Peter.

[5] Papacy: from Greek root Pope ‘father’. Also papacy and pontifex derived from the same root, f. pons pontis, bridge+ fex f. facere make

[6] See NovusOrdoWatch - Cardinal Siri - Pope Gregory XVII http://www.novusordowatch.org/siri.htm

[7] Cardinal Augustin Bea, Secretariat to Pope John XXIII and Pope Paul VI was a Mason [Stephen Mahowald, “She Shall Crush Thy Head”, page 215]

[8] Archbishop Paul Marcinkus, apart from being a Mason, was in the ‘70s involved with the Banco Ambrosiano scandal & Sindona (the Mafioso), in Italy.

[9] Cardinal Walter Kasper, on a few occasions, declared that Jews do not need conversion.

[10] Cardinal Leo Suenens, apart from being a Mason, belonged to the group of modernist Cardinals during Vatican II, as well as a leader of the Charismatic movement. [“She Shall Crush Thy Head” – page 219].